Harry Wright, manager of the Phillies for the first decade or so, had a younger brother George, a star player in his own right who ended up in the Hall of Fame. That much is historical fact. The problem is, throughout the first few chapters, the authors repeatedly refer to manager Wright as George. They even quote Al Reach, owner of the Phillies at the time, addressing his manager as "George". I doubt that Mr. Reach was that clueless about his ballclub; obviously the quotes are fabrications. But this occurs with such regularity that I finally had to consult BaseballReference.com and verify that George Wright had no affiliation with the Phillies at the time.I don't mean to quibble over a minor detail, but it makes me wonder how many other inaccuracies and outright fabrications are there that I didn't notice because I'm not all that well versed in baseball history. And the fact that the authors were two highly respected veteran sportswriters from the middle of the past century makes me wonder about the reliability of sports journalism generally from that period.The book was well written, interesting, entertaining, and held my attention consistently. I'd like to say informative as well, and I did learn a lot about early baseball; I'm just not sure how much of what I learned actually took place.